Enter the password to view the submission.
Use Google Gemini to create an assessment-style trigonometric application problem, verify it meets every expectation, solve it completely by hand, then compare your work against Gemini's own solution.


Building the sinusoidal model, solving for the dependent variable at 1:30 PM, and solving for the independent variable — the first time after noon the water depth reaches 8.0 m.





At least three clear and concise similarities and differences, ranging from generic to specific comparisons.
| Criteria | Level 4Excellent | Level 3Good | Level 2Fair | Level 1Needs Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communication Mathematical Form (Observational) /1 |
The student consistently uses proper mathematical form in their written work with precision and clarity. | The student generally uses proper mathematical form in their written work. | The student sometimes uses proper mathematical form in their written work, but inconsistencies or errors are present. | The student rarely uses proper mathematical form in their written work; significant errors are frequent. |
| Communication Problem Analysis and Prompting /1 |
The student thoroughly analyzes Gemini's generated problem and demonstrates sophisticated prompting to ensure all required elements for a trigonometric model are present and clear. | The student analyzes Gemini's generated problem and uses effective prompting to ensure most required elements for a trigonometric model are present. | The student attempts to analyze Gemini's problem and prompt for necessary elements, but the resulting problem may lack some clarity or sufficient information. | The student struggles to analyze Gemini's problem or to prompt effectively, resulting in a problem that does not meet the specified expectations. |
| Application Your Complete Solution /2 |
The student's complete solution (including the trigonometric model and accurate solving for both independent and dependent variables) is flawlessly executed, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of sinusoidal functions and their application. | The student's complete solution (including the trigonometric model and accurate solving for both independent and dependent variables) is correct and effectively executed. | The student's complete solution attempts to create a model and solve for variables, but may contain minor errors or omissions. | The student's solution is largely incorrect, incomplete, or demonstrates a significant lack of understanding in creating the model or solving for variables. |
| Thinking Comparison /3 |
The student provides a thorough and insightful comparison of Gemini's solution to their own, identifying multiple (more than 3) clear, concise, and nuanced similarities and differences, demonstrating critical thinking and a deep understanding of the problem-solving process. | The student compares the Gemini's solution to their solution and provides at least 3 clear and concise similarities and differences. | The student attempts to compare the Gemini's solution to their own, but the comparison may be superficial, incomplete, or lack clarity and conciseness; fewer than 3 similarities and differences may be provided. | The student does not compare the Gemini's solution to their own, or the comparison is missing, irrelevant, or incomprehensible. |